513 - Allow non-authors to verify fixed tickets
What is the enhancement in mind? How should it look and feel?
Since QA people are hard to come by and I like to abuse the community at large for testing purposes, it seems like it'd be a good idea to let normal users to mark fixed tickets as verified.
This could theoretically be an option that authors can set on their projects.
| User | When | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Torhal | Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:56:03 | Changed assigned to from None to prencher |
| Ackis | Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:01:51 | Changed assigned to from ckknight to None |
| Ackis | Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:47:26 | Changed component from None to Component #15 |
| Ackis | Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:19:43 | Changed assigned to from None to ckknight |
| ckknight | Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:15:43 | Create |
- 6 comments
- 6 comments
Facts
- Last updated on
- 15 Sep 2011
- Reported on
- 11 Aug 2008
- Status
- New - Issue has not had initial review yet.
- Type
- Enhancement - A change which is intended to better the project in some way
- Priority
- Medium - Normal priority.
Reported by
Votes (Total: +41, Average: +2.4)
-
Votes +3
-
Votes +3
-
Votes +3
-
Votes +3
-
Votes +3
-
Votes +3
-
Votes +3
-
Votes +3
-
Votes +3
-
Votes +2
-
Votes +2
-
Votes +2
-
Votes +2
-
Votes +2
-
Votes +2
-
Votes +1
-
Votes +1
- Reply
- #6
x87bliss Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:21:40What about setting up a "poll" kind of system. People could vote the fix as either verified or not. If after a certain period of time the author does not manually update the ticket, it'll be marked as verified or not by the popular vote.
It should be restricted that each unique username gets one vote; however, they should be allowed to change or withdraw their vote if necessary (as long as the do so during the voting window).
- Reply
- #5
Zasurus Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:22:21This could also be time specific. So for example if the original poster hadn't replied in a week then two or three other posters could mark it as fixed. :-)
- Reply
- #4
seppyk Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:11:48If this is implemented, I would like a configuration option relating to this to provide a bit more control.
I am supportive of non-project members taking a more active role in project management, but for certain defects or projects, I would only want to allow non-project members to verify defects/enhancements for tickets they were the original submitter.
If desired, this would provide more control and not allow random non-project members to go in verifying any random defect.
- Reply
- #3
Zyuu Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:32:40Hi.
- Reply
- #2
Arrowmaster Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:20:02Ckknight just wants to abuse me more to fix his stuff for him =(
Oh wait I can already do this....
MORE PEOPLE MUST JOIN ME IN THE SUFFERING!
- Reply
- #1
Ackis Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:18:56A check and balance situation would be nice... for example we have an approved list of QA they can verify solo, however a threshold for random verifications would be nice. Joe user and bob user would both have to verify before it gets set to "verified". For the threshold a custom value for each project would also help (ie: if I want 5 people to verify, I can set it to 5).