347 - Repository browser
It would be nice to have a repository browser to allow a fish-like visualization of a project's source repository.
Fish itself for git/hg may be too ambitious (or has that been done?), but a viewcvs-like interface would be more than enough.
| User | When | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Torhal | Jun 03, 2011 at 17:01 UTC | Changed assigned to from Kaelten to prencher |
| Kaelten | Mar 05, 2009 at 04:58 UTC | Changed assigned to from Ackis to Kaelten |
| Kaelten | Mar 05, 2009 at 04:58 UTC | Changed assigned to from Kaelten to Ackis |
| Kaelten | Mar 05, 2009 at 04:56 UTC | Changed component from None to Component #18 |
| Ackis | Mar 02, 2009 at 16:12 UTC | Changed component from None to Component #18 |
- 9 comments
- 9 comments
Facts
- Last updated
- Mar 30, 2012
- Reported
- Jul 04, 2008
- Status
- Accepted - Problem reproduced / Need acknowledged.
- Type
- Enhancement - A change which is intended to better the project in some way
- Priority
- Medium - Normal priority.
- Votes
- 61
- Reply
- #10
sylvanaar Sep 19, 2009 at 14:59 UTC - 0 likesI think that rather than a repository browser for 3 version control systems - you could implement a zip file browser. It would be trivial to implement this way.
You could build on that functionality. Since the version is already put into the addon's toc by the packager, you could very easily get the source file which matches a given debugstack.
Also - browsing the zip would show you the source after it has been pre-proceesed, another plus.
- Reply
- #9
Kaelten Mar 05, 2009 at 04:49 UTC - 0 likesoh, we've been using pygments for small things around the site for a while. We actually use several librarys by the guys over at pocoo.org.
WowAce.com & CurseForge.com Adminstrator
Check out my new addon, OneChoice, it helps you pick quest rewards faster.
Developer of Ace3, OneBag3, and many other addons and libraries
Project lead and Mac developer for the Curse Client
- Reply
- #7
Arrowmaster Aug 25, 2008 at 18:09 UTC - 0 likesI only support this idea if the solution is good. I HATE VIEWCVS AND VIEWVC THOUGH!
- Reply
- #6
dafire Aug 15, 2008 at 09:15 UTC - 0 likesthis might be helpful :) http://pygments.org/
- Reply
- #5
anmoch Aug 15, 2008 at 07:57 UTC - 0 likesWell that's the point isn't it. Fish allows you to view the _history_, which is painful with SVN in any case because it requires extra round-trips to the server. OTOH in Git/Hg you just clone and explore the history locally.
I'm all for Fish/SVN, I'm just saying I can live without it for Git/Hg.
- Reply
- #4
Dashkal Jul 15, 2008 at 18:34 UTC - 0 likesDoing single checkouts of SVN is fast as well. git may be fast, but a single checkout of SVN doesn't take long unless the project is huge. If the project is huge, git would take just as long anyway (though it would get more done).
The point is to avoid having to checkout at all so one can easily browse when required.
- Reply
- #3
anmoch Jul 08, 2008 at 12:15 UTC - 0 likesGit (and probably Hg) hardly needs this because cloning the repo for local browsing is extremely fast. +1 for SVN though
- Reply
- #2
Kaelten Jul 04, 2008 at 17:31 UTC - 0 likesvote on it guys, to help prioritize.
- Reply
- #1
Kaelten Jul 04, 2008 at 17:31 UTC - 0 likesChanged status from 'New' to 'Accepted'
Assign ticket to Kaelten