It would be nice to have a repository browser to allow a fish-like visualization of a project's source repository.
Fish itself for git/hg may be too ambitious (or has that been done?), but a viewcvs-like interface would be more than enough.
| User | When | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Kaelten | Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:58:34 | Changed assigned to from Ackis to Kaelten |
| Kaelten | Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:58:19 | Changed assigned to from Kaelten to Ackis |
| Kaelten | Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:56:49 | Changed component from None to Repositories |
| Ackis | Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:12:10 | Changed component from None to Repositories |
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +3
Votes +2
Votes +2
Votes +2
Votes +1
Votes +1
Votes +1
Votes +1
Votes +1
© 2008-2009 Curse Inc.
- #9
Kaelten Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:49:07oh, we've been using pygments for small things around the site for a while. We actually use several librarys by the guys over at pocoo.org.
WowAce.com & CurseForge.com Adminstrator
Developer of Ace3, OneBag3, and many other addons and libraries
Project lead and Mac developer for the Curse Client
- #7
Arrowmaster Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:09:37I only support this idea if the solution is good. I HATE VIEWCVS AND VIEWVC THOUGH!
- #6
dafire Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:15:46this might be helpful :) http://pygments.org/
- #5
anmoch Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:57:50Well that's the point isn't it. Fish allows you to view the _history_, which is painful with SVN in any case because it requires extra round-trips to the server. OTOH in Git/Hg you just clone and explore the history locally.
I'm all for Fish/SVN, I'm just saying I can live without it for Git/Hg.
- #4
Dashkal Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:34:56Doing single checkouts of SVN is fast as well. git may be fast, but a single checkout of SVN doesn't take long unless the project is huge. If the project is huge, git would take just as long anyway (though it would get more done).
The point is to avoid having to checkout at all so one can easily browse when required.
- #3
anmoch Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:15:24Git (and probably Hg) hardly needs this because cloning the repo for local browsing is extremely fast. +1 for SVN though
- #2
Kaelten Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:31:55vote on it guys, to help prioritize.
- #1
Kaelten Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:31:41Changed status from 'New' to 'Accepted'
Assign ticket to Kaelten